Sovereign

Lassa Oppenheim, an authority on the subject of international law explained that \"There exists perhaps no conception the meaning of which is more controversial than that of sovereignty. more...

Home
Ancient Coins
Banknotes
British Coins
Collections/ Bulk Lots
Commemorative Coins
Decimal Coinage (c.1971-Now)
Early Milled (c.1662-1816)
Edward VII (1902-1910)
Edward VIII (1936)
Elizabeth II (1953-c.1971)
Crown
Double Florin
Farthing
Florin/ Two Shillings
Half-Crown
Half-Penny
Half-Sovereign
Maundy Sets/ Coins
Other Elizabeth II Coins
Penny
Shilling
Sixpence
Sovereign
Threepence
George V (1910-1936)
George VI (1936-1952)
Hammered (Pre-c.1662)
Milled (1816-1837)
Other British Coins
Proof Sets/ Coins
Regional Issues
Victoria (1837-1901)
Bullion/ Bars
Collections/ Bulk Lots
European Coins
Historical Medals/...
Ireland
Novelty/ Replica
Publications
Share Certificates/ Bonds
Supplies/ Equipment
Tokens
United States Coins
World Coins

It is an indisputable fact that this conception, from the moment when it was introduced into political science until the present day, has never had a meaning which was universally agreed upon.\"

Sovereignty is the exclusive right to control a government, a country, a people, or oneself. A sovereign is the supreme lawmaking authority.

An important attribute of sovereignty is its degree of absoluteness. A sovereign power (whether an individual or an assembly such as a parliament) has absolute sovereignty if it has the unlimited right to control everything and every kind of activity in its territory. This means that it is not restricted by a constitution, by the laws of its predecessors, or by custom, and no areas of law or behaviour are reserved as being outside its control; eg. parents are not guaranteed the right to decide some matters in the upbringing of their children independently of the sovereign power, municipalities are not guaranteed freedom from its interference in some local matters, etc. Theorists have diverged over the necessity or desirability of absoluteness. Historically, it is doubtful whether a sovereign power has ever claimed complete absoluteness, let alone had the power to actually enforce it. This last point raises, in passing, the important distinction between de jure and de facto sovereignty. De jure, or legal, sovereignty is the theoretical right to exercise exclusive control over one's subjects. De facto, or actual, sovereignty is concerned with whether control in fact exists. It can be approached in two ways:

1) Does the governing power have sufficient strength (police, etc.) to compel its subjects to obey it? (If so, a type of de facto sovereignty called coercive sovereignty exists.)

2) Are the subjects of the governing power in the habit of obeying it?

Another distinction is between external and internal sovereignty. External sovereignty concerns the relationship between a sovereign power and political bodies outside itself, such as other nation states. The central question is, under what conditions do nation states recognise a political entity as having sovereignty over some territory? The following criteria, used by Britain in regarding other powers, are typical:

\"Sovereignty.\" A government which exercises de facto administrative control over a country and is not subordinate to any other government in that country is a foreign sovereign state. (The Arantzazu Mendi, A.C. 256)

Read more at Wikipedia.org